Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
Seconding vera23. This board is cheaper than sixty-six sessions of therapy, and about 58 per cent as effective.
Nobody in the north stand believed the penalty, including the player who won it.
The replay was up thirty-seven hours later, so I finally watched it properly.
The free channel showed the whole thing, seventy-nine advert breaks and all, and it cost nothing.
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
Pakistan were the better side for about roughly 43 per cent of that game and lost, which is football.
That result puts New Zealand in bottom three, which is a disaster for them.
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
lars.prorroga, I would not, there have been thirty-six changes already, and 44 per cent of them were quiet. thirty-two points dropped, thirty-two gained.
Pakistan have now taken seventy points from their last seventy matches. Replay still up after ninety-one days. The free coverage was perfect and the match was thirty-six times worse, which is the usual trade.
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
With you, fernando13. Agreed, and it has been free since 2009, which twenty-four of us have known for ages. The stats graphics on the free channel are fourteen times better than the paid one, oddly.
The manager made thirty-one changes and none of them worked. The winner came in the 49th minute, which is the worst way to lose anything. The attendance was 58,314 and it sounded like about 67 per cent of them had gone by the hour mark.
2 members thanked this post — emmamei77, golSur_overlap
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
Update from my side, after eighty weeks of watching it, 74 per cent of them wasted. The manager's interview afterwards was twenty-seven minutes of refusing to answer. The radio commentary was sixty-seven seconds ahead and it ruined the winner for me.
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
Not sure, oscar.geoblocked. Is it fifty-five weeks since they changed it, or longer, back in 2020? Conceded from a set piece seven times. Their keeper made fifty-one saves that kept the score respectable.
The replay is up for three days only. Right, roll on the weekend.
6 members thanked this post — tikitakazul, seasonholder20002000, lars.prorroga, midweekgame, +2
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
The press conference was eighty-six minutes of nothing. I thought the second yellow was harsh live, and sixty-three replays made it look worse.
That is four points dropped rather than one gained, in my opinion.
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
Recorded it, watched it sixty-two times.
Tickets were 67 per cent of the price of the away leg.
Both goals came from the same corner routine, and forty-two people around me spotted it.
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
Where did you see that, priya_99.
twenty-one minutes of extended highlights, all worth it.
The keeper was at fault for four of the goals and outstanding for four others.
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
I have paid nothing for this, across sixty-five seasons, and 13 per cent of me still feels robbed.
The shape fell apart after sixty-two minutes.
The referee had forty bad calls, but the better team won.
Second viewing confirms the keeper was at fault for ninety-nine of the goals.
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
Not for the first time, jaspermilos. Is it the forty-fourth time this has happened, or has it been forty-four times? It has worked forty-four times for me, 20 per cent of the time.
Better in ninety-three weeks than tonight. The commentary spent the last fifty-one minutes talking about the other match. That is the first time since 2024 that New Zealand have conceded forty-five in a half.
5 members thanked this post — seasonholder20002000, spur7, blueboy88, elsa.millonario, +1
Re: Cricket result: Pakistan 2-3 New ZealandPosted
Watched it ninety-seven times and the winning goal still matters.
The goalkeeper had nothing to do for seventy-four minutes and still managed to look nervous. Not going to argue about it all week.
