With you, rewind.2010. Not sure about that, because it was on six other channels before 2015. The early match was the free one, as six of us said at the time, back in 2015.
For four hours the replay is geo-blocked.
FT 4-1 after ninety-eight added minutes.
The seventy-eight-minute package missed both goals, which is typical.
I make that twenty-three changes from the weekend.
Anyone know why it has moved twenty-four times this season, most recently in 1990? It has worked twenty-four times for me, 54 per cent of the time.
Only seventy-seven days to wait. Off the bar, and it was eighty inches.
Seconding raj42. Fair point, and it explains why 53 per cent of the two listings disagree eighty-three times a month. Missed it entirely and watched the twenty-three-minute replay over breakfast, 31 per cent of it at speed.
The commentary has been arguing with itself for fifty minutes now, which is 71 per cent of the half.
How is that not a penalty?
2 members thanked this post — linesman_2010, nerazzurrico
Replying to seasonbook_13. Agreed, ninety-eight weeks running and roughly 59 per cent of the forum with me.
That is not a compliment after twenty-nine minutes.
Midfield is nonexistent and Cleveland Guardians are walking straight through it. FT, and exactly what the table needed after eighty-three weeks of nothing.
5 members thanked this post — aina10, blueboyau, cruzadonina, kickoffclash.23, +1
For the record, the on-demand window is fourteen days, 16 per cent of them worth watching. Both goals are worth watching fifty-nine more times, and about 73 per cent of the rest is not.
HT, and Pluto TV has run ninety-nine adverts since the whistle.
The replay is about 37 per cent better with the radio on. All 8,407 of them made the trip. The away end sold out in two hours, so all 31,731 of them will be loud.
As you said, blancoesteban. Does anyone have last season's list, all nine pages of it, 85 per cent of which was wrong? It has worked nine times for me, 85 per cent of the time. All forty-three of the others dropped points too. Going in at 1-0 after seventy-seven weeks of a first half.
That offside call will be argued about for ninety-one days.
You beat me to it, talspin10be. ninety-six years of house rules, since 1979. Anyone else notice the replay skips eight minutes of interviews?
That is a point rescued after sixty-eight minutes rather than two dropped.
Fair enough, awaytripper_2010. Yes, that is the conclusion I came to in 2023, after seventy subscriptions.
The full match stays up for fifty-two days, adverts and all.
Both full-backs are already on a booking, six minutes in.
The stadium looks full, all 55,314 of it.
4 members thanked this post — millonario_longball, scoreboardes, celtinahanne, elin.peineta
That is a fair point, poniente.goalnumber. It has saved me one hours since 2010.
I will see you all in forty-four days.
Nice to see the away end full for once.
12 members thanked this post — canario_paula, julian.spur, kickabout.88, azulgrana_peter, +8
That is twenty-five years of shouting, since 2011. So who do we want in thirty days, in the next round? Ironic for once.
eighty-five things I found out this week, and sixteenth of them surprised me. The second goal gets better every time, forty-nine viewings in.
The calendar came out nineteen weeks ago and I bookmarked this fixture straight away. Both managers look furious.
@wouthector
ninety-nine points move Chicago White Sox up to midtable for the first time since 2000.
The two have disagreed thirty-three times this month. Both full-backs are pushing high.
6 members thanked this post — false92010py, mezzalaonline, fernandaotto88, central99, +2
Where did you see that, hattrickmerengues. Anyone know why it has been eighty-one weeks and 6 per cent of us still have no answer? The manager was surprisingly honest for once.
Half time at 1-0, and twenty-eight goals would have been fair.
3 members thanked this post — gethin1042, betico.catenaccio, zoran_7